Some of these documents are protected by various copyright laws, and they may be used for personal research use only. Your click on any of the links below constitutes your request for a personal copy of the linked article, and results in our delivery of a personal copy. Any other use is prohibited.

Fitzroy, A. B., & Sanders, L. D. (2015). Musical Meter Modulates the Allocation of Attention across Time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00862

Zobel, B. H., Freyman, R. L., & Sanders, L. D. (2015). Attention is critical for spatial auditory object formation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(6), 1998–2010. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0907-4

Breen, M., Dilley, L. C., McAuley, J. D., & Sanders, L. D. (2014). Auditory evoked potentials reveal early perceptual effects of distal prosody on speech segmentation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(9), 1132–1146. http://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.894642

Morrill, T. H., McAuley, J. D., Dilley, L. C., Zdziarska, P. A., Jones, K. B., & Sanders, L. D. (2014). Distal prosody affects learning of novel words in an artificial language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(3), 815–823. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0733-z

Fitzroy, A. B., & Sanders, L. D. (2013). Musical expertise modulates early processing of syntactic violations in language. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 603. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00603

Shen, E. Y., Staub, A., & Sanders, L. D. (2013). Event-related brain potential evidence that local nouns affect subject–verb agreement processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(4), 498–524. http://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.650900

Breen, M., Kingston, J., & Sanders, L. D. (2013). Perceptual representations of phonotactically illegal syllables. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(1), 101–120. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0376-y

Astheimer, L. B., & Sanders, L. D. (2012). Temporally selective attention supports speech processing in 3- to 5-year-old children. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 120–128. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.03.002

Sanders, L. D., & Zobel, B. H. (2012). Nonverbal spatially selective attention in 4- and 5-year-old children. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(3), 317–328. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2012.03.004

Astheimer, L. B., & Sanders, L. D. (2011). Predictability affects early perceptual processing of word onsets in continuous speech. Neuropsychologia, 49(12), 3512–3516. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.014

Sanders, L. D., Zobel, B. H., Freyman, R. L., & Keen, R. (2011). Manipulations of listeners’ echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(1), 301–309. http://doi.org/10.1121/1.3514518

Sanders, L. D., Ameral, V., & Sayles, K. (2009). Event-related potentials index segmentation of nonsense sounds. Neuropsychologia, 47(4), 1183–1186. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.005

Ashby, J., Sanders, L. D., & Kingston, J. (2009). Skilled readers begin processing sub-phonemic features by 80ms during visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 84–94. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.009

Astheimer, L. B., & Sanders, L. D. (2009). Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 23–34. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.01.015

Sanders, L. D., & Astheimer, L. B. (2008). Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: Event-related potential evidence. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(4), 732–742. http://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.4.732

Sanders, L. D., Joh, A. S., Keen, R. E., & Freyman, R. L. (2008). One sound or two? Object-related negativity indexes echo perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(8), 1558–1570. http://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.8.1558

Stevens, C., Fanning, J., Coch, D., Sanders, L., & Neville, H. (2008). Neural mechanisms of selective auditory attention are enhanced by computerized training: Electrophysiological evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Brain Research, 1205, 55–69. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.108

Sanders, L. D., Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (2008). Varying degrees of plasticity in different subsystems within language. In J. R. Pomerantz (Ed.), Topics in integrative neuroscience: From cells to cognition (pp. 125–153). Cambridge University Press.

Sanders, L. D., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Local and global auditory processing: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Neuropsychologia, 45(6), 1172–1186. http://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.neuropsychologia.2006.10.010

Stevens, C., Sanders, L., & Neville, H. (2006). Neurophysiological evidence for selective auditory attention deficits in children with specific language impairment. Brain Research, 1111(1), 143–152. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.114

Sanders, L. D., Stevens, C., Coch, D., & Neville, H. J. (2006). Selective auditory attention in 3-to 5-year-old children: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2126–2138. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.007

Coch, D., Sanders, L. D., & Neville, H. J. (2005). An Event-related Potential Study of Selective Auditory Attention in Children and Adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(4), 605–622. http://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053467631

Sanders, L. D., & Neville, H. J. (2003). An ERP study of continuous speech processing. II. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in non-native speakers. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(3), 214–227. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00194-5

Sanders, L. D., & Neville, H. J. (2003). An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(3), 228–240. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00195-7

Sanders, L. D., Newport, E. L., & Neville, H. J. (2002). Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech. Nature Neuroscience, 5(7), 700–703. http://doi.org/10.1038/nn873

Sanders, L. D., Neville, H. J., & Woldorff, M. G. (2002). Speech Segmentation by Native and Non-Native Speakers: The Use of Lexical, Syntactic, and Stress-Pattern Cues. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 45(3), 519–530. http://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/041)

Sanders, L. D., & Neville, H. J. (2000). Lexical, Syntactic, and Stress-Pattern Cues for Speech Segmentation. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 43(6), 1301–1321. http://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4306.1301